<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ProBlogger RSS Feeds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/21/problogger-rss-feeds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/21/problogger-rss-feeds/</link>
	<description>Make Money Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:41:01 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Leonivek</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/21/problogger-rss-feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-6409</link>
		<dc:creator>Leonivek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 13:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/21/problogger-rss-feeds/#comment-6409</guid>
		<description>I use Feedburner for my blog too, and I&#039;ve subscribed myself to it with Newsgator in Outlook and I haven&#039;t encountered these missing posts except for Problogger, as mentioned in the comments here:
http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/21/feedburner-review-work-boxers/

I don&#039;t have many subscribers to my blog&#039;s feed so I can&#039;t confirm if it does this for other people.

Darren, do you use the SmartFeed feature of Feedburner?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Feedburner for my blog too, and I&#8217;ve subscribed myself to it with Newsgator in Outlook and I haven&#8217;t encountered these missing posts except for Problogger, as mentioned in the comments here:<br />
<a href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/21/feedburner-review-work-boxers/" rel="nofollow">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/21/feedburner-review-work-boxers/</a></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have many subscribers to my blog&#8217;s feed so I can&#8217;t confirm if it does this for other people.</p>
<p>Darren, do you use the SmartFeed feature of Feedburner?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicole Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/21/problogger-rss-feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-6378</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicole Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 08:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/21/problogger-rss-feeds/#comment-6378</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t had problems till now - but I was wondering why I had not seen a post in one day from you. ;o)

But you - as everybody else - should do a hidden feedburner feed  = the url is your domain, all subscribes go to your domain but the backend is feedburner. This way you don&#039;t loose anything once you ever switch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t had problems till now &#8211; but I was wondering why I had not seen a post in one day from you. ;o)</p>
<p>But you &#8211; as everybody else &#8211; should do a hidden feedburner feed  = the url is your domain, all subscribes go to your domain but the backend is feedburner. This way you don&#8217;t loose anything once you ever switch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Schnoor</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/21/problogger-rss-feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-6363</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Schnoor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 05:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/21/problogger-rss-feeds/#comment-6363</guid>
		<description>Just a minute ago, I wondered why people had a feedburner link to your blog, but then I remembered that I&#039;d browse the sourcecode and always look for the meta information instead of searching XML or RSS buttons in the sidebars... this probably depends on the entire userbehaviour. And since you offer RSS 2.0, I&#039;d always use it.
&lt;link rel=&quot;alternate&quot; type=&quot;application/rss+xml&quot; title=&quot;RSS 2.0&quot; href=&quot;http://www.problogger.net/feed/rss2/&quot; /&gt;
The question is tho, is the number of those who use the WP-feed higher than those who use the feedburner access?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a minute ago, I wondered why people had a feedburner link to your blog, but then I remembered that I&#8217;d browse the sourcecode and always look for the meta information instead of searching XML or RSS buttons in the sidebars&#8230; this probably depends on the entire userbehaviour. And since you offer RSS 2.0, I&#8217;d always use it.</p>
<link rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" title="RSS 2.0" href="http://www.problogger.net/feed/rss2/" />
The question is tho, is the number of those who use the WP-feed higher than those who use the feedburner access?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
