<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Making your blog sticky</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/02/making-your-blog-sticky/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/02/making-your-blog-sticky/</link>
	<description>Make Money Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:19:19 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kevin D. Hendricks</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/02/making-your-blog-sticky/comment-page-1/#comment-6558</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin D. Hendricks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2005 17:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/02/making-your-blog-sticky/#comment-6558</guid>
		<description>I imagine such a &#039;recent posts&#039; feature would require a dynamic blog system where individual entry pages are created on the fly? Either that or you&#039;d need to rebuild your individual entries every few days to keep the posts current.

The default on Movable Type is for static pages, which means once a post is saved the individual entry page won&#039;t be updated until you rebuild, thus the recent entries it lists will be as current as your last rebuild. 

Do other systems have a better solution for this? And has anyone tried Movable Type&#039;s dynamic page-generation? I know they have the option, but I haven&#039;t looked into it much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I imagine such a &#8216;recent posts&#8217; feature would require a dynamic blog system where individual entry pages are created on the fly? Either that or you&#8217;d need to rebuild your individual entries every few days to keep the posts current.</p>
<p>The default on Movable Type is for static pages, which means once a post is saved the individual entry page won&#8217;t be updated until you rebuild, thus the recent entries it lists will be as current as your last rebuild. </p>
<p>Do other systems have a better solution for this? And has anyone tried Movable Type&#8217;s dynamic page-generation? I know they have the option, but I haven&#8217;t looked into it much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/02/making-your-blog-sticky/comment-page-1/#comment-6119</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2005 23:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/02/making-your-blog-sticky/#comment-6119</guid>
		<description>I just read his blog his tip is good and is worth trying in my new blog. That made me stick to reading his post although, I do need some resting place for my eyes once in a while.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read his blog his tip is good and is worth trying in my new blog. That made me stick to reading his post although, I do need some resting place for my eyes once in a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/02/making-your-blog-sticky/comment-page-1/#comment-4141</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2005 03:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/02/making-your-blog-sticky/#comment-4141</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t really have a problem with his font though - is fine on my screen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t really have a problem with his font though &#8211; is fine on my screen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/02/making-your-blog-sticky/comment-page-1/#comment-4140</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2005 03:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/02/making-your-blog-sticky/#comment-4140</guid>
		<description>Interesting comments guys - to be honest I&#039;d never really considered those aspects of the Blog Herald - maybe because I tend to read him initially in News Aggregator and when i do go to his actual site I&#039;m usually there specifically because I like something that he writes and am concentrating on the content itself.

Having said that I agree with what you say in the text based nature of the site - especially on the longer posts like the one&#039;s I&#039;ve linked to in this post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting comments guys &#8211; to be honest I&#8217;d never really considered those aspects of the Blog Herald &#8211; maybe because I tend to read him initially in News Aggregator and when i do go to his actual site I&#8217;m usually there specifically because I like something that he writes and am concentrating on the content itself.</p>
<p>Having said that I agree with what you say in the text based nature of the site &#8211; especially on the longer posts like the one&#8217;s I&#8217;ve linked to in this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Collins</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/02/making-your-blog-sticky/comment-page-1/#comment-4137</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2005 03:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/02/making-your-blog-sticky/#comment-4137</guid>
		<description>I agree, an easier-to-read font would encourage people to stick around longer. I&#039;d also break up those monster blocks of text into smaller paragraphs, so it doesn&#039;t intimidate readers so much. It&#039;s tough going reading the longer blocks of text on that site.

The content seems quite good, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, an easier-to-read font would encourage people to stick around longer. I&#8217;d also break up those monster blocks of text into smaller paragraphs, so it doesn&#8217;t intimidate readers so much. It&#8217;s tough going reading the longer blocks of text on that site.</p>
<p>The content seems quite good, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/02/making-your-blog-sticky/comment-page-1/#comment-4058</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2005 07:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/02/making-your-blog-sticky/#comment-4058</guid>
		<description>if you look at Blog Herald its good that he got a 10% rise in readership.
Cool functionality he&#039;s adding. And also i have some advice for him, although it may or may not work for the type of readership he has and site content.
1. Use a better font. (present one is kinda tricky on the eyes)
2. Add more pictures and make them larger. (bring some feeling to the site)

 just  my two cents.It&#039;s worth a try and you can always take &#039;em out if it don&#039;t work. Right now his site looks super dry. Too much text. (i&#039;m also not his target audience from a content standpoint just to put that in perspective)

j</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if you look at Blog Herald its good that he got a 10% rise in readership.<br />
Cool functionality he&#8217;s adding. And also i have some advice for him, although it may or may not work for the type of readership he has and site content.<br />
1. Use a better font. (present one is kinda tricky on the eyes)<br />
2. Add more pictures and make them larger. (bring some feeling to the site)</p>
<p> just  my two cents.It&#8217;s worth a try and you can always take &#8216;em out if it don&#8217;t work. Right now his site looks super dry. Too much text. (i&#8217;m also not his target audience from a content standpoint just to put that in perspective)</p>
<p>j</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
