<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WordPress Spam Saga Developments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/01/wordpress-spam-saga-developments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/01/wordpress-spam-saga-developments/</link>
	<description>Blog Tips to Help You Make Money Blogging - ProBlogger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:25:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PFJ</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/01/wordpress-spam-saga-developments/comment-page-1/#comment-4011</link>
		<dc:creator>PFJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2005 00:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/01/wordpress-spam-saga-developments/#comment-4011</guid>
		<description>I think it was abit harsh to penalize them for adding content to their site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it was abit harsh to penalize them for adding content to their site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/01/wordpress-spam-saga-developments/comment-page-1/#comment-3950</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2005 14:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/01/wordpress-spam-saga-developments/#comment-3950</guid>
		<description>I guess to a certain extent they had to allow wordpress back into the page rank system even if only with a page rank of 0 otherwise since google owns blogger it could be argued there was a conflict of interest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess to a certain extent they had to allow wordpress back into the page rank system even if only with a page rank of 0 otherwise since google owns blogger it could be argued there was a conflict of interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/01/wordpress-spam-saga-developments/comment-page-1/#comment-3902</link>
		<dc:creator>jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2005 02:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/04/01/wordpress-spam-saga-developments/#comment-3902</guid>
		<description>Wow, now I&#039;ve got the same page rank as WordPress!!! LOL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, now I&#8217;ve got the same page rank as WordPress!!! LOL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/9 queries in 0.073 seconds using memcached

Served from: www.problogger.net @ 2012-02-11 01:03:20 -->
