<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wordpress Website&#8217;s Search Engine Spam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/03/31/wordpress-websites-search-engine-spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/03/31/wordpress-websites-search-engine-spam/</link>
	<description>Make Money Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:03:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fresh News</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/03/31/wordpress-websites-search-engine-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-4601587</link>
		<dc:creator>Fresh News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/03/31/wordpress-websites-search-engine-spam/#comment-4601587</guid>
		<description>Last day we have discussed about this with one of my friends. Information that you gave cleared our questions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last day we have discussed about this with one of my friends. Information that you gave cleared our questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/03/31/wordpress-websites-search-engine-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-3873</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2005 21:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/03/31/wordpress-websites-search-engine-spam/#comment-3873</guid>
		<description>Well SmartMoney - it could be because they see it as Duplicate content (which is my main concern with &#039;free articles&#039;) but I also wonder if it could be that they see it as spamming their search engine. 

One of the things I noticed in their Adsense rules is that they do not allow sites to be developed with the specific aim of making money (which always confused me a little) - but perhaps they see what WP is doing as junky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well SmartMoney &#8211; it could be because they see it as Duplicate content (which is my main concern with &#8216;free articles&#8217;) but I also wonder if it could be that they see it as spamming their search engine. </p>
<p>One of the things I noticed in their Adsense rules is that they do not allow sites to be developed with the specific aim of making money (which always confused me a little) &#8211; but perhaps they see what WP is doing as junky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SmartMoney</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/03/31/wordpress-websites-search-engine-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-3841</link>
		<dc:creator>SmartMoney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2005 18:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/03/31/wordpress-websites-search-engine-spam/#comment-3841</guid>
		<description>Darren, can you explain why Google would de-index these pages from their results? Is there a rule against duplicate content and if so, wouldn&#039;t being in a different context (ie. sitting on a different site) be enough to make it unique?

I am curious because I have given other sites permission to reprint some stories I have written and don&#039;t want it to come back to haunt me. Should I be worried about that?

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darren, can you explain why Google would de-index these pages from their results? Is there a rule against duplicate content and if so, wouldn&#8217;t being in a different context (ie. sitting on a different site) be enough to make it unique?</p>
<p>I am curious because I have given other sites permission to reprint some stories I have written and don&#8217;t want it to come back to haunt me. Should I be worried about that?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Nguyen</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/03/31/wordpress-websites-search-engine-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-3830</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Nguyen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2005 16:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/03/31/wordpress-websites-search-engine-spam/#comment-3830</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry but abusing Wordpress.org&#039;s Pagerank in order to serve cloaked pages to google is lame.

Blogging is about transparency and honesty - all this does is take away from the credibility of bloggers in general.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry but abusing Wordpress.org&#8217;s Pagerank in order to serve cloaked pages to google is lame.</p>
<p>Blogging is about transparency and honesty &#8211; all this does is take away from the credibility of bloggers in general.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/03/31/wordpress-websites-search-engine-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-3826</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/03/31/wordpress-websites-search-engine-spam/#comment-3826</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Wordpress and search spam&lt;/strong&gt;
WordPress has been caught by spamming search engines by Andy Baio. They created about 120,000 small webpages stuffed by high payed keywords like &#8220;cialis&#8221;, &#8220;credit&#8221; and so on, and put invisible links on main page of wordpress.org...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Wordpress and search spam</strong><br />
WordPress has been caught by spamming search engines by Andy Baio. They created about 120,000 small webpages stuffed by high payed keywords like &ldquo;cialis&rdquo;, &ldquo;credit&rdquo; and so on, and put invisible links on main page of wordpress.org&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danger Stevens</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/03/31/wordpress-websites-search-engine-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-3813</link>
		<dc:creator>Danger Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2005 07:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/03/31/wordpress-websites-search-engine-spam/#comment-3813</guid>
		<description>update: It seems that Matt has no intention of doing it against the will of anyone in the community (source: the waxy article).  I take back what I said about it being cheap - but I still think it&#039;d be better not on the main website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>update: It seems that Matt has no intention of doing it against the will of anyone in the community (source: the waxy article).  I take back what I said about it being cheap &#8211; but I still think it&#8217;d be better not on the main website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danger Stevens</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/03/31/wordpress-websites-search-engine-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-3810</link>
		<dc:creator>Danger Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2005 06:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/03/31/wordpress-websites-search-engine-spam/#comment-3810</guid>
		<description>I definitely agree that if this is done it shouldn&#039;t be on the official WordPress site.  In fact, I think whoever&#039;s running it should develop it as a personal project and simply donate the revenue to WordPress.  As it is, it makes me feel less honored to write WordPress code (I&#039;m writing some plugins) because it cheapens the feeling of community that open source provides it&#039;s contributors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I definitely agree that if this is done it shouldn&#8217;t be on the official WordPress site.  In fact, I think whoever&#8217;s running it should develop it as a personal project and simply donate the revenue to WordPress.  As it is, it makes me feel less honored to write WordPress code (I&#8217;m writing some plugins) because it cheapens the feeling of community that open source provides it&#8217;s contributors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
