<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spam Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/03/14/spam-blogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/03/14/spam-blogs/</link>
	<description>Make Money Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:03:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Hurlbert</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/03/14/spam-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-1916</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Hurlbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2005 22:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/03/14/spam-blogs/#comment-1916</guid>
		<description>Too many sites, in this case blogs, interlinked to one another are a known filter trigger for Google. They are not only downgraded in the search rankings, but often receive penalties for spamming besides. Interlinking blogs and/or traditional websites is a bad search engine strategy that will not yield good results. It will likely get you banned from Google though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too many sites, in this case blogs, interlinked to one another are a known filter trigger for Google. They are not only downgraded in the search rankings, but often receive penalties for spamming besides. Interlinking blogs and/or traditional websites is a bad search engine strategy that will not yield good results. It will likely get you banned from Google though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danger Stevens</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/03/14/spam-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-1860</link>
		<dc:creator>Danger Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2005 17:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/03/14/spam-blogs/#comment-1860</guid>
		<description>I tried one of those as an experiment recently.  I didn&#039;t even put ads on it because I was hoping to keep it ethical (though blog ethics is likey a discussion all it&#039;s own).  I discovered is after 4300 automated posts filled with relevant links - all on a niche topic - that Google hates it.  My handwritten blog on Linux is doing far better.
Hopefully many spam blogs go this way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried one of those as an experiment recently.  I didn&#8217;t even put ads on it because I was hoping to keep it ethical (though blog ethics is likey a discussion all it&#8217;s own).  I discovered is after 4300 automated posts filled with relevant links &#8211; all on a niche topic &#8211; that Google hates it.  My handwritten blog on Linux is doing far better.<br />
Hopefully many spam blogs go this way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
