<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Search Engine Optimization for MSN Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/03/08/search-engine-optimization-for-msn-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/03/08/search-engine-optimization-for-msn-search/</link>
	<description>Make Money Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:59:38 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/03/08/search-engine-optimization-for-msn-search/comment-page-1/#comment-1642</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 09:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/03/08/search-engine-optimization-for-msn-search/#comment-1642</guid>
		<description>So because my website is tables based, my whole page wont be read?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So because my website is tables based, my whole page wont be read?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/03/08/search-engine-optimization-for-msn-search/comment-page-1/#comment-1630</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 13:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/03/08/search-engine-optimization-for-msn-search/#comment-1630</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve noticed that the new MSN is also much faster at indexing my site and much faster at finding inbound links to my site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve noticed that the new MSN is also much faster at indexing my site and much faster at finding inbound links to my site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danger Stevens</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/03/08/search-engine-optimization-for-msn-search/comment-page-1/#comment-1628</link>
		<dc:creator>Danger Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 08:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/03/08/search-engine-optimization-for-msn-search/#comment-1628</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been loving the new MSN search because it definitly puts my sites higher up than Google does.  I also seem to be having a much easier time getting listed under the right keywords.  Google&#039;s been finicky with many of my sites lateley as they&#039;ll rank them highly one week and drop them the next.  One domain even made the jump from page 13 of Google to the top of page two just this week.

All in all, I&#039;m enjoying the solid traffic through MSN much more.  Has anyone else found MSN brings traffic more steadily than Google?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been loving the new MSN search because it definitly puts my sites higher up than Google does.  I also seem to be having a much easier time getting listed under the right keywords.  Google&#8217;s been finicky with many of my sites lateley as they&#8217;ll rank them highly one week and drop them the next.  One domain even made the jump from page 13 of Google to the top of page two just this week.</p>
<p>All in all, I&#8217;m enjoying the solid traffic through MSN much more.  Has anyone else found MSN brings traffic more steadily than Google?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
