<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Team Blogging the Only Profitable Way? Part II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/02/22/team-blogging-the-only-profitable-way-part-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/02/22/team-blogging-the-only-profitable-way-part-ii/</link>
	<description>Make Money Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:59:38 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/02/22/team-blogging-the-only-profitable-way-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-1102</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 02:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/02/22/team-blogging-the-only-profitable-way-part-ii/#comment-1102</guid>
		<description>Well said, Eoghann.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said, Eoghann.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eoghann Irving</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/02/22/team-blogging-the-only-profitable-way-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-1084</link>
		<dc:creator>Eoghann Irving</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2005 23:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/02/22/team-blogging-the-only-profitable-way-part-ii/#comment-1084</guid>
		<description>Perhaps this is a weakness in me but whenever someone starts talking about &quot;processes&quot; and other assorted jargon in order to make their case I tend to think they are over-complicating something very simple.

Basically I&#039;d agree that a team of bloggers will be able to generate a greater income than any single individual simply by virtue of their being more of them and them having a wider range of skills to pull from.

But the notion that you aren&#039;t &quot;building a business&quot; is bull. Anything that enables you to earn a living from doing it is a business. Anyone who attempts to argue otherwise  is just playing with words. 

Is it a sustainable model? Hard to tell yet what with blogs being so young. Is it going to challenge Time Warner? Well no, but then neither do most small businesses.

You don&#039;t have to have an empire in order to have a business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps this is a weakness in me but whenever someone starts talking about &#8220;processes&#8221; and other assorted jargon in order to make their case I tend to think they are over-complicating something very simple.</p>
<p>Basically I&#8217;d agree that a team of bloggers will be able to generate a greater income than any single individual simply by virtue of their being more of them and them having a wider range of skills to pull from.</p>
<p>But the notion that you aren&#8217;t &#8220;building a business&#8221; is bull. Anything that enables you to earn a living from doing it is a business. Anyone who attempts to argue otherwise  is just playing with words. </p>
<p>Is it a sustainable model? Hard to tell yet what with blogs being so young. Is it going to challenge Time Warner? Well no, but then neither do most small businesses.</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t have to have an empire in order to have a business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pc4media</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/02/22/team-blogging-the-only-profitable-way-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-1083</link>
		<dc:creator>pc4media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2005 23:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/02/22/team-blogging-the-only-profitable-way-part-ii/#comment-1083</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Building a Business Out of Blogging (or any media company) Requires a Team - Part XVI&lt;/strong&gt;
Darren Rowse has counterpointed my counterpoint to his counterpoint that was started here. As he said in an email, </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Building a Business Out of Blogging (or any media company) Requires a Team &#8211; Part XVI</strong><br />
Darren Rowse has counterpointed my counterpoint to his counterpoint that was started here. As he said in an email,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/02/22/team-blogging-the-only-profitable-way-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-1078</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2005 06:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/02/22/team-blogging-the-only-profitable-way-part-ii/#comment-1078</guid>
		<description>Well said Darren. I still consider my &quot;one man band&quot; a business that is more than a product. I can sell my business at any time and I would not be selling a product, but a business.

Like you said, the only difference is the scale of the operations. But, the advantage of a one man operation is low operating costs and the ability to make quick and firm decisions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said Darren. I still consider my &#8220;one man band&#8221; a business that is more than a product. I can sell my business at any time and I would not be selling a product, but a business.</p>
<p>Like you said, the only difference is the scale of the operations. But, the advantage of a one man operation is low operating costs and the ability to make quick and firm decisions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
