<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google to Revamp Adsense and Adwords Program</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/01/22/google-to-revamp-adsense-and-adwords-program/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/01/22/google-to-revamp-adsense-and-adwords-program/</link>
	<description>Blog Tips to Help You Make Money Blogging - ProBlogger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:04:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Payne</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/01/22/google-to-revamp-adsense-and-adwords-program/comment-page-1/#comment-297</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Payne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/01/22/google-to-revamp-adsense-and-adwords-program/#comment-297</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the heads up.  As it seems they are legitimately looking to improve their service and offering to advertisers (their paying customers), this would seem only logical.

Regarding website publishers having virtually no control, I&#039;d have to respectfully disagree.  Certainly I&#039;d like more control, but as AdWords are targeted based on your site&#039;s content, you can simply change the content or your site to re-target the ads.  Body text and title tags are about all it takes to get targeted ads.  I believe you can also choose to exclude ads from certain URLs if you wish (i.e. competitors).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the heads up.  As it seems they are legitimately looking to improve their service and offering to advertisers (their paying customers), this would seem only logical.</p>
<p>Regarding website publishers having virtually no control, I&#8217;d have to respectfully disagree.  Certainly I&#8217;d like more control, but as AdWords are targeted based on your site&#8217;s content, you can simply change the content or your site to re-target the ads.  Body text and title tags are about all it takes to get targeted ads.  I believe you can also choose to exclude ads from certain URLs if you wish (i.e. competitors).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WebsiteNova</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/01/22/google-to-revamp-adsense-and-adwords-program/comment-page-1/#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator>WebsiteNova</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/01/22/google-to-revamp-adsense-and-adwords-program/#comment-298</guid>
		<description>Adsense was never about &quot;choosing&quot; your display, per se. Relevent traffic is important for adwords clients, and I don&#039;t think the big G is going to let restaurant sites run Vioxx campaigns...

Sweeping changes are rare, but I am anxious to see what will happen.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adsense was never about &#8220;choosing&#8221; your display, per se. Relevent traffic is important for adwords clients, and I don&#8217;t think the big G is going to let restaurant sites run Vioxx campaigns&#8230;</p>
<p>Sweeping changes are rare, but I am anxious to see what will happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 2/8 queries in 0.037 seconds using memcached

Served from: www.problogger.net @ 2012-02-11 03:44:34 -->
