<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google to Kill Blog Comment Spam?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/01/18/google-to-kill-blog-comment-spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/01/18/google-to-kill-blog-comment-spam/</link>
	<description>Make Money Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:20:07 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mirc</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/01/18/google-to-kill-blog-comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-4676006</link>
		<dc:creator>mirc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 05:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/01/18/google-to-kill-blog-comment-spam/#comment-4676006</guid>
		<description>What about nofollow abuse? I used to work for a pretty popular tech information network and the one thing they were in CONSTANT search of was ways to keep all the PR points to themselves,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about nofollow abuse? I used to work for a pretty popular tech information network and the one thing they were in CONSTANT search of was ways to keep all the PR points to themselves,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeux de voiture</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/01/18/google-to-kill-blog-comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-4428694</link>
		<dc:creator>jeux de voiture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 11:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/01/18/google-to-kill-blog-comment-spam/#comment-4428694</guid>
		<description>Oh !! that would be a put off for some commenters .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh !! that would be a put off for some commenters .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alfred Malveo</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/01/18/google-to-kill-blog-comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-2005479</link>
		<dc:creator>Alfred Malveo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 01:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/01/18/google-to-kill-blog-comment-spam/#comment-2005479</guid>
		<description>What would happen if people started posting for their top competitors in an effort to drive them out of business????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What would happen if people started posting for their top competitors in an effort to drive them out of business????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liam</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/01/18/google-to-kill-blog-comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-1128286</link>
		<dc:creator>Liam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 16:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/01/18/google-to-kill-blog-comment-spam/#comment-1128286</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a big difference between links from blog comments not contributing to PageRank, and links from blog comments not influencing SERPs at all. As everyone knows, low page rank pages can beat much higher page rank pages in SERPs even when both are reasonable matches in content, etc. showing that page rank is not one of the most dominant factors influencing SERPs.

Making links from blog comments of no significance at all would be throwing out the baby with the bathwater, as blog comments that contain valid discussion are a relatively high quality type of content. People reading specialised blogs and commenting on them tend to be predominantly people with specialist knowledge.

What is needed are ways of distinguishing spam comments from valid comments and eliminating the trash. Turing confirmation is perhaps the most obvious of these, and it would benefit everyone (except the spam polluters) to put into place barriers that were very difficult to circumvent for spambots, but very little hindrance for people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a big difference between links from blog comments not contributing to PageRank, and links from blog comments not influencing SERPs at all. As everyone knows, low page rank pages can beat much higher page rank pages in SERPs even when both are reasonable matches in content, etc. showing that page rank is not one of the most dominant factors influencing SERPs.</p>
<p>Making links from blog comments of no significance at all would be throwing out the baby with the bathwater, as blog comments that contain valid discussion are a relatively high quality type of content. People reading specialised blogs and commenting on them tend to be predominantly people with specialist knowledge.</p>
<p>What is needed are ways of distinguishing spam comments from valid comments and eliminating the trash. Turing confirmation is perhaps the most obvious of these, and it would benefit everyone (except the spam polluters) to put into place barriers that were very difficult to circumvent for spambots, but very little hindrance for people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ngt</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/01/18/google-to-kill-blog-comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-426506</link>
		<dc:creator>ngt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 16:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/01/18/google-to-kill-blog-comment-spam/#comment-426506</guid>
		<description>Exciting website. Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exciting website. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gnorb</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/01/18/google-to-kill-blog-comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-474</link>
		<dc:creator>Gnorb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2005 17:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/01/18/google-to-kill-blog-comment-spam/#comment-474</guid>
		<description>What about nofollow abuse? I used to work for a pretty popular tech information network and the one thing they were in CONSTANT search of was ways to keep all the PR points to themselves. They developed campaigns where readers could link to them, but links that went to other pages had to go through a PHP script that in essence stripped any links of PR that might be passed down. (And I&#039;m not talking about spammers or forum posters, I&#039;m talking about links that writers and editors put on the site for the sake of their stories, like technical whitepapers, or online resources. Links didn&#039;t go from point A to point B with maybe a target=&quot;top&quot;, links went from point A to a script which redirected from A to A.1, to A.2, to A.3... then finally to point B.) Could websites simply rel=nofollow everything except maybe paid/traded links? What would be the ethical consideration there, or is there one? Could the abuse of rel=nofollow be considered a type of theft?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about nofollow abuse? I used to work for a pretty popular tech information network and the one thing they were in CONSTANT search of was ways to keep all the PR points to themselves. They developed campaigns where readers could link to them, but links that went to other pages had to go through a PHP script that in essence stripped any links of PR that might be passed down. (And I&#8217;m not talking about spammers or forum posters, I&#8217;m talking about links that writers and editors put on the site for the sake of their stories, like technical whitepapers, or online resources. Links didn&#8217;t go from point A to point B with maybe a target=&#8221;top&#8221;, links went from point A to a script which redirected from A to A.1, to A.2, to A.3&#8230; then finally to point B.) Could websites simply rel=nofollow everything except maybe paid/traded links? What would be the ethical consideration there, or is there one? Could the abuse of rel=nofollow be considered a type of theft?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Articles about link building and PageRank</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/01/18/google-to-kill-blog-comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-278</link>
		<dc:creator>Articles about link building and PageRank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/01/18/google-to-kill-blog-comment-spam/#comment-278</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; attribute to fight spam in comments?&lt;/strong&gt;
There&#039;s a new rumor about Google... another one! Google might be testing a new mechanism allowing to fight comment spam, by ignoring links that contain a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; attribute.


Here is a standard link:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; attribute to fight spam in comments?</strong><br />
There&#8217;s a new rumor about Google&#8230; another one! Google might be testing a new mechanism allowing to fight comment spam, by ignoring links that contain a rel=&#8221;nofollow&#8221; attribute.</p>
<p>Here is a standard link:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Threadwatch.org</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/01/18/google-to-kill-blog-comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-279</link>
		<dc:creator>Threadwatch.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/01/18/google-to-kill-blog-comment-spam/#comment-279</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;NoFollow - A Non-Solution to Comment Spam&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Late last night bloggers all over the world started what im sure will be a very short-lived networked jump for joy as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/googleblog/2005/01/preventing-comment-spam.html&quot;&gt;Google&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>NoFollow &#8211; A Non-Solution to Comment Spam</strong></p>
<p>Late last night bloggers all over the world started what im sure will be a very short-lived networked jump for joy as <a href="http://www.google.com/googleblog/2005/01/preventing-comment-spam.html">Google</a>, </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Threadwatch.org</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/01/18/google-to-kill-blog-comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-280</link>
		<dc:creator>Threadwatch.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/01/18/google-to-kill-blog-comment-spam/#comment-280</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;NoFollow - A Non-Solution to Comment Spam&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Late last night bloggers all over the world started what im sure will be a very short-lived networked jump for joy as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/googleblog/2005/01/preventing-comment-spam.html&quot;&gt;Google&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>NoFollow &#8211; A Non-Solution to Comment Spam</strong></p>
<p>Late last night bloggers all over the world started what im sure will be a very short-lived networked jump for joy as <a href="http://www.google.com/googleblog/2005/01/preventing-comment-spam.html">Google</a>, </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Platinax Internet News</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/01/18/google-to-kill-blog-comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-281</link>
		<dc:creator>Platinax Internet News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/01/18/google-to-kill-blog-comment-spam/#comment-281</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;New nofollow tag cheers bloggers, but fails blogs?&lt;/strong&gt;
A new tag is to be supported by Google, and it looks likely that Yahoo! and Microsoft will lend some degree of support to it. Publicly claimed to be for the fight against blog spam, it effectively leaves the search...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>New nofollow tag cheers bloggers, but fails blogs?</strong><br />
A new tag is to be supported by Google, and it looks likely that Yahoo! and Microsoft will lend some degree of support to it. Publicly claimed to be for the fight against blog spam, it effectively leaves the search&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
