<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pro Blogger&#8217;s Errors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/01/14/pro-bloggers-errors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/01/14/pro-bloggers-errors/</link>
	<description>Blog Tips to Help You Make Money Blogging - ProBlogger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:48:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/01/14/pro-bloggers-errors/comment-page-1/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/01/14/pro-bloggers-errors/#comment-270</guid>
		<description>Those are great tips. I guess in #2 seperate domains are better, but if you have hundreds of them, it will be expensive. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those are great tips. I guess in #2 seperate domains are better, but if you have hundreds of them, it will be expensive. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/01/14/pro-bloggers-errors/comment-page-1/#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/01/14/pro-bloggers-errors/#comment-271</guid>
		<description>Yes... it gets much, much more time intensive and costly to do stand alone domains. We pulled back from 100 blogs in year one to 70 so we could do more   comprehensive, full-featured blogs like www.gadling.com, www.luxist.com, and www.joystiq.com. These blogs are really metablogs with 8-15 topics. We could have done a scuba blog instead of Gadling for example, or an XBOX blog instead of Joystiq. You get the idea.

To be honest, I&#039;m not sure what the right model is... I&#039;m just throwing stuff against the wall and seeing if it sticks!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes&#8230; it gets much, much more time intensive and costly to do stand alone domains. We pulled back from 100 blogs in year one to 70 so we could do more   comprehensive, full-featured blogs like <a href="http://www.gadling.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.gadling.com</a>, <a href="http://www.luxist.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.luxist.com</a>, and <a href="http://www.joystiq.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.joystiq.com</a>. These blogs are really metablogs with 8-15 topics. We could have done a scuba blog instead of Gadling for example, or an XBOX blog instead of Joystiq. You get the idea.</p>
<p>To be honest, I&#8217;m not sure what the right model is&#8230; I&#8217;m just throwing stuff against the wall and seeing if it sticks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 2/8 queries in 0.098 seconds using memcached

Served from: www.problogger.net @ 2012-02-11 00:20:52 -->
