<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: About.com &#8211; Megablog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2004/12/31/aboutcom-megablog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2004/12/31/aboutcom-megablog/</link>
	<description>Make Money Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:07:50 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Moncur</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2004/12/31/aboutcom-megablog/comment-page-1/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Moncur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2004/12/31/aboutcom-megablog/#comment-204</guid>
		<description>Heh! Nice to see this pointed out. In fact, check out the Internet Archive - it looks like About.com has been featuring a reverse-chronological list of new items on their pages since 1999.

However, About.com&#039;s focus the last couple of years seems to be (a) cutting expenses and (b) squeezing as many ads as possible onto each page. I don&#039;t find any of their sites valuable enough to visit frequently, despite them covering some of my favorite topics.

If they realize they&#039;re the world&#039;s largest blog producer and make some changes to be more like WIN or Gawker--an emphasis on good writing, less ads, more participation in the blogging community, etc--they could practically own the game.

Anyone remember when they were called The Mining Company?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh! Nice to see this pointed out. In fact, check out the Internet Archive &#8211; it looks like About.com has been featuring a reverse-chronological list of new items on their pages since 1999.</p>
<p>However, About.com&#8217;s focus the last couple of years seems to be (a) cutting expenses and (b) squeezing as many ads as possible onto each page. I don&#8217;t find any of their sites valuable enough to visit frequently, despite them covering some of my favorite topics.</p>
<p>If they realize they&#8217;re the world&#8217;s largest blog producer and make some changes to be more like WIN or Gawker&#8211;an emphasis on good writing, less ads, more participation in the blogging community, etc&#8211;they could practically own the game.</p>
<p>Anyone remember when they were called The Mining Company?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jozef Imrich</title>
		<link>http://www.problogger.net/archives/2004/12/31/aboutcom-megablog/comment-page-1/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>Jozef Imrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2004/12/31/aboutcom-megablog/#comment-205</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great links &#8230;</p>
<p>This is my guiding principle in journalism: My readers know more than I do, and that&#8217;s great!<br />
—San Jose Mercury News&#8217; Dan Gillmor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
